Este medio se sostiene gracias a su comunidad. APOYA EL PERIODISMO INDEPENDIENTE .
Poppies in a cereal field. Jordi Recasens Guinjuan, Author provided
Spring is here and many fields of crops are dotted with red poppies. Farmers know that this is not a good sign, even if hundreds of people show up, mobile phones in hand, in search of the best photograph.
Poppies, along with other species that grow in fields, can be a problem for crops if they appear in large numbers. We informally call them weeds, but what are they really and how bad are they?
Impersonators of cultivated plants
Weeds are generally annual or pluri-annual herbaceous plant species that are adapted to environments that are frequently disturbed, such as fields of crops. Their survival strategy is to resemble the crop as much as possible, to maximise their chances of survival and reproduction. To accomplish that, they germinate, flower, or mature at times similar to the crop, or they have a similar growth strategy.
There are species that are highly adapted to the winter grain cycle, such as the poppy (Papaver roheas) and annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Others, such as lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), are adapted to summer crops (for example, corn), which have rainwater or irrigation available.
Woody fields such as olive groves and vineyards also have their own species like wall-rocket (Diplotaxis spp.). In these cases, the plants are more adapted to management (harvesting, tilling) and not so much to the timing of the crop itself.
From the point of view of their adaptive strategy, weeds are plants that thrive in fertile environments that are regularly disturbed, a strategy defined as “type R”, for “ruderal”. Fields of crops are one of the primary places where these conditions occur. The high levels of fertility are provided by manure or fertilisers and the disturbances include working the soil, harvesting, chipping, and/or the application of herbicides.
A species of wall-rocket (Diplotaxis catholica).
Jordi Recasens, Author provided
Weeds: are they always bad?
Because they grow in the same places as crops, weeds compete for space, light, and resources such as water and nutrients. It is estimated that, worldwide, these plants can reduce harvests by up to 30%. They are the organisms that cause the most losses, even more than pests and crop diseases.
Apart from crop losses, weeds can reduce the quality of the harvested product (grain or forage contamination), transmit diseases to crops, and make agricultural tasks more difficult.
However, some species and their seeds also contribute to providing ecosystem services. For example, they contribute to biodiversity, host beneficial insects and pollinators, feed birds, and reduce erosion at certain times of the year.
So, then, what determines if a plant is a weed? Although this is a complex question, the answer lies in the plant’s density and time of growth, its competitiveness with the crop in question, and its seed production. The latter will determine the persistence of the problem in successive years.
It is true that some very competitive species (like cleavers, Galium aparine) can, in turn, promote ecosystem services by harbouring a vast array of beneficial insects. However, the more aggressive and dominant species are not usually the ones that are best at providing these positive effects.
Cleavers (Galium aparine).
Jordi Recasens, Author provided
Consequences of improper handling
For a plant to become a “weed”, it must thrive in fields of crops, and that is where the paradox comes in: many of the most competitive and aggressive weeds are often this way due to inappropriate management. For example, an excessive use of herbicides along with poor crop rotation has promoted, in several species, the selection of biotypes that are resistant to these chemical products. This has aggravated their impact on crops and it makes control options more difficult.
Likewise, an excessive use of fertilisers has favoured, in some cases, the development of very competitive species adapted to such scenarios. This is the result of the great degree of resilience of these plants; that is, their ability to adapt and perpetuate themselves when faced with the different changes that come about through their management.
In most cases where weeds cause major yield losses, one or just a few species that are functionally very similar to each other are the culprits. This means that these species have similar germination times or a similar growth strategy and resource assimilation. For example, in grain fields, we can look at annual ryegrass, wild oat (Avena sterilis), and the poppy. Likewise, in corn fields, noteworthy are lambs quarters, black nightshade (Solanum nigrum), and foxtail (Setaria spp.).
Wild oat (Avena sterilis) and poppies (Papaver roheas) in a grain field.
Jordi Recasens, Author provided
These species are the ones that manage to pass through all the “filters” put in place by the environment (temperature, rainfall/irrigation, etc.) and crop management (working the fields, herbicides, etc.). They are the most competitive species and displace others.
To try to control them, we sometimes fall into the trap of upping the pressure against them, using the same tools (more doses of herbicides, more work in general) and not leaving behind the very system that allowed for their presence in the first place (like monoculture). There are many good reasons why farmers act this way, but the truth is that sometimes this mentality only makes the problem worse.
Can we live with weeds?
To get out of this vicious circle, it is necessary to diversify – not just crops, but also soil-management tactics, weed-control tools, harvest times, and even mentalities.
Over the medium and long term, the diversification of agroecosystems also results in the diversification of weed communities. Some recent studies confirm that the greater the diversity of weeds, the less competitiveness the resulting community has with the crop. The more species coexist in one place, the lower the probability is of there being a dominant species.
It is worth asking ourselves if we could design weed communities that are less competitive. That is where we are at: trying to design productive agroecosystems in which management goes hand in hand with the ecological processes that govern the life of crops (and also weeds).
Bàrbara Baraibar Padró receives funding from the Beatriu de Pinós postdoctoral programme of the Secretary of Universities and Research (Generalitat de Catalunya) and from the European research and innovation programme Horizon 2020 under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie covenant number 801370.
Jordi Recasens Guinjuan receives funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the State Research Agency, through public calls, to develop research projects.
Este periodismo no lo financian bancos ni partidos
Lo sostienen personas como tú. En un contexto de ruido, propaganda y desinformación, hacer periodismo crítico, independiente y sin miedo tiene un coste.
Si este artículo te ha servido, te ha informado o te ha hecho pensar, puedes ayudarnos a seguir publicando.
Cada aportación cuenta. Sin intermediarios. Sin líneas rojas impuestas. Solo periodismo sostenido por su comunidad.
Related posts
SÍGUENOS
Netanyahu ya no disimula: Gaza se ocupa por porcentajes
Netanyahu ya no disimula. Gaza se está ocupando por porcentajes: primero el 52%, luego el 60%, ahora ordena avanzar hasta el 70% y, cuando el público le pide el 100%, responde con una broma: “vayamos en orden”.
Eso no es seguridad. Es desposesión administrada. Es convertir un alto el fuego en una coartada para encerrar a 2,1 millones de personas en cada vez menos territorio, mientras el mundo finge sorpresa ante una estrategia que lleva meses desplegándose delante de todos.
Cuando un Gobierno habla de ocupar Gaza por fases, ya no estamos ante una guerra: estamos ante un plan.
👉 El artículo completo puede leerse en el primer comentario.
Y si quieres ayudarnos a seguir haciendo periodismo que no baja la cabeza:
donorbox.org/aliadas
Contra el racismo institucional: Ayuso intentó vender colapso y el Supremo le contestó con una palabra incómoda, pruebas
Ayuso intentó vender colapso y el Supremo le ha contestado con lo único que desmonta la propaganda: pruebas. Y no las había. Ni de que la sanidad fuera a hundirse, ni de que la educación fuera a reventar, ni de que Madrid fuese a convertirse en una especie de apocalipsis administrativo por regularizar a personas migrantes.
El truco es viejo y miserable: primero deterioran lo público y luego culpan a quienes llegan buscando derechos, trabajo y una vida posible. No era gestión. Era racismo institucional con membrete oficial.
El artículo completo puede leerse en el primer comentario 👇
Y si queréis ayudarnos a seguir haciendo periodismo que no agacha la cabeza: Donorbox.org/aliadas
Aimar Bretos toma ‘Hoy por hoy’ mientras la SER intenta vender normalidad donde huele a crisis
La SER intenta vender como relevo natural lo que suena demasiado a operación de poder.
Aimar Bretos asumirá Hoy por hoy el 31 de agosto, tras la salida de Àngels Barceló después de 21 años en la cadena y 7 al frente del programa. El problema no es Bretos. El problema es ese viejo truco de llamar “pluralidad” a lo que muchas veces significa presión editorial, ajuste interno y disciplina empresarial.
Porque cuando una periodista sale así, cuando compañeras y compañeros lamentan públicamente las formas, cuando la plantilla tiene que defender su profesionalidad, la palabra independencia empieza a sonar menos a principio y más a decorado.
A lo que llaman relevo quizá haya que llamarlo por su nombre: una operación de despacho con música de sintonía.
👉 Artículo completo en el primer comentario.
💥 Puedes ayudarnos a seguir haciendo periodismo incómodo en Donorbox.org/aliadas.
Vídeo | Palantir en España: el contrato opaco que mete a Silicon Valley en el corazón de Defensa
Defensa entregó a una empresa nacida en el ecosistema de la CIA una pieza sensible de la inteligencia militar española, sin publicidad, con una sola oferta y bajo una capa de secreto que huele demasiado a negocio blindado.
Vídeo | Palantir en España: el contrato opaco que mete el tecnofascismo en Defensa
Mientras nos hablan de modernización, eficiencia y seguridad, el Estado español abre la puerta de su inteligencia militar a una de las empresas más vinculadas al negocio global de la vigilancia, la guerra y el poder algorítmico. Te lo contamos en #ReportajesSR. Presentado por Patricia Salvador.
Seguir
Seguir
Seguir
Subscribe
Seguir