Este medio se sostiene gracias a su comunidad. APOYA EL PERIODISMO INDEPENDIENTE .
What is your sign? If you can answer that question, you are one of the 90% of adults who know your zodiac sign. This is no surprise: the media, social networks and digital applications have all recently given a new push to astrology.
In contrast, in a survey conducted in the United States, only 57% of respondents knew their blood type. What makes astrology so special?
Astrology: the study of the stars to read the future
Astrology is defined as the study of the position and movement of the stars as a means of predicting future events and finding out about people’s character. It originated in Babylon around the year 700-450 BC, when the 12 zodiac signs were established – with their interpretation focused on predicting events in the population.
It was in ancient Greece where predictions were transferred to individuals and were made based on the relative position of the stars at the time of birth. For example, the fact that a person is a Gemini means that, at the time of their birth, the Sun (projected in the sky) was in the position that aligned with the Gemini constellation.
The constellations of the zodiac are those in which the Sun is projected, in a straight line, along the Earth’s annual path.
Author provided
The Earth, when revolving around the Sun, makes its way through the different constellations. That path is known as the ecliptic plane. The sun sign, according to astrologers, represents our personality, self-perception, love compatibility, and basic preferences. Thus, studying the position of the celestial bodies can help us choose better friends, suitable love relationships, and make better decisions both professionally and financially.
As the Earth travels around the Sun (blue ellipse), the Sun appears to move through the constellations of the zodiac (black line).
Tartila/Shutterstock, Author provided
Three reasons to change your horoscope
There are at least three reasons why your zodiac sign is most likely not what you think.
The Babylonians observed that there were 13 different constellations on the ecliptic plane; however, since they had a 12-month calendar dictated by the phases of the Moon, they decided to keep that value and used 12 constellations to name the zodiacal signs. The Babylonians deliberately left one out: Ophiuchus.
All the constellations have different lengths; thus, they are in front of the Sun for variable amounts of time. For example, Leo spans 37 days while Scorpio spans only 7. This leaves many who claim to be Scorpio out of it, among other irregularities.
Due to the gravitational influence of the Sun and the Moon, the Earth wobbles slightly. Thus, the north pole deviates little by little, producing the precession effect. The result is an apparent change in the position of the constellations. Since the zodiac signs were established around 3,000 years ago, they have now moved about a month.
For someone who was born on June 1 three thousand years ago, the Sun would have been in the Gemini constellation. Currently, due to precession, on June 1 the Sun is not in Gemini but instead in the constellation Taurus.
The most famous experiment in astrology: the Naninga Astrotest
In 1996, an experiment was published in which 44 astrologers tried to match the birth data (date, time, and place) of seven anonymous people with their respective personality questionnaires.
The questionnaires were taken from the Berkeley University Personality Profile, and there were other questions also included suggested by the 44 astrologers. Aspects related to education, family, vocation, hobbies, personality, relationships, health, etc. were covered.
The astrologer who managed to correctly match the seven anonymous people’s birth data with their respective questionnaires would win $2,500. The results were disappointing for astrology: the most skilled astrologer had 3 correct matches out of 7, and half of the participants (22) did not have a single correct answer.
There are several articles that put astrology and its predictive power to the test. Spoiler alert: astrology fails every time. An astrologer has the same chances of being right about aspects of our future as anyone else who bases their responses on chance.
There are people who decide on their partner based on the zodiac signs. Nevertheless, it seems that love is not dictated by the stars. A study carried out with 10 million marriages in England and Wales showed that there is no evidence of attraction (or rejection) between the different zodiac signs.
Why astrology convinces so many
Although it is well proven that astrology does not get things right, 27% of Americans and 23% of the French believe in it, while 46% of Mexicans feel that their horoscope is something important in their lives.
Why is that? Astrology is an extremely profitable business. In the United States alone, astrology apps brought in $40 million for their creators in 2019. This makes astrology be promoted even more online, and more and more people are getting into the market.
But the most interesting thing in all this is that humans are prone to errors and biases related with judgement and reasoning. This means that horoscopes fit into our mental mechanisms. Specifically, they rely on what we know as confirmation bias and the Barnum effect.
Confirmation bias shows that prior beliefs and expectations can influence the selection, retention and evaluation of evidence; that is, we look for information that supports our ideas and ignore information that contradicts them.
For example, if our horoscope mentions that “it will be a day of strong contrasts” and we have a very calm day, we will simply ignore that prediction. However, if we really do have a day of contrasts, the first thing we will think is, “Of course, the horoscope warned me.”
The Barnum effect is a psychological phenomenon that consists of perceiving general and ambiguous descriptions (applicable to everyone) as if they were highly precise statements (made specifically for us).
The horoscope of a serial killer
In 1968, French psychologist Michel Gauquelin published a newspaper ad. In exchange for one’s name, address, date of birth and place of birth, he offered a 10-page personalised horoscope free of charge. A real bargain!
After receiving the horoscope, 94% of those who had sent in their information said they were satisfied with the results, with 90% even stating that their relatives had found the descriptions of their profile to be correct. Where is the catch? They had all received the same text! The horoscope sent out by Michel Gauquelin was that of a serial killer born in France on January 17, 1897.
Horoscopes promise certainty (“our fate is in the stars”). Therefore, it is not surprising that people usually turn to horoscopes in times of great uncertainty. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, searches related to horoscopes had their highest peak in years.
The aim of this article is not for people to stop reading horoscopes, because they can be an excellent source of entertainment and fun. Nonetheless, we must emphasise that there is no connection between the position of the stars and our lives.
And although horoscopes seem harmless fun, we must remember that French President Charles de Gaulle, Queen Elizabeth I of England and Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi all had astrologers to help them make decisions during their tenures.
Just remember that Cassius said to Brutus (in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare):
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars.
Las personas firmantes no son asalariadas, ni consultoras, ni poseen acciones, ni reciben financiación de ninguna compañía u organización que pueda obtener beneficio de este artículo, y han declarado carecer de vínculos relevantes más allá del cargo académico citado anteriormente.
Este periodismo no lo financian bancos ni partidos
Lo sostienen personas como tú. En un contexto de ruido, propaganda y desinformación, hacer periodismo crítico, independiente y sin miedo tiene un coste.
Si este artículo te ha servido, te ha informado o te ha hecho pensar, puedes ayudarnos a seguir publicando.
Cada aportación cuenta. Sin intermediarios. Sin líneas rojas impuestas. Solo periodismo sostenido por su comunidad.
Related posts
SÍGUENOS
González Amador y el negocio privado junto al poder público que Ayuso no podrá justificar jamás
Entre 2021 y 2023, Alberto González Amador, pareja de Isabel Díaz Ayuso, ganó una media de casi 1,5 millones de euros al año. No está mal para un “ciudadano cualquiera”. Tampoco está mal que esos fueran, precisamente, los primeros años de su relación con la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid. Casualidades. Siempre casualidades. En Madrid parece que la suerte empresarial cae del cielo, pero solo en ciertos áticos, ciertos despachos y ciertas sociedades con nombres pulidos.
González Amador había creado su consultora en 2016. Al año siguiente empezó a hacer auditorías para Quirónprevención. Entonces sus facturaciones estaban por debajo de los 400.000 euros. Después vino el salto. Y no un salto pequeño. Un salto de esos que en cualquier democracia mínimamente higiénica obligaría a abrir ventanas, expedientes y preguntas públicas. Porque Quirón recibe cada año alrededor de 1.000 millones de euros por su cooperación hospitalaria en la Comunidad de Madrid. Ahí está la línea de puntos. No hace falta ser detective. Basta con no querer mirar hacia otro lado.
¿Ha cruzado Peinado la última línea?
El juez Juan Carlos Peinado ha vuelto a hacer lo que mejor define esta instrucción: estirar el caso hasta convertirlo en un espectáculo político con toga. El 20 de junio, el magistrado envió a juicio a Begoña Gómez, esposa del presidente del Gobierno, Pedro Sánchez, y le impuso medidas cautelares: retirada del pasaporte, prohibición de salir del territorio nacional y comparecencia quincenal en el juzgado. Hasta ahí, el repertorio habitual de una causa que lleva demasiado tiempo oliendo más a obsesión que a justicia.
Pero esta vez Peinado fue más lejos. Mucho más lejos. En su auto llegó a sugerir que los agentes encargados de escoltar a Begoña Gómez podrían, “bien por iniciativa propia o siguiendo órdenes de sus superiores jerárquicos”, colaborar en una hipotética fuga. Es decir, el juez no solo dibuja a la investigada como alguien que podría escapar. Dibuja también a policías nacionales como posibles cómplices. Sin una prueba concreta encima de la mesa. Sin individualizar conductas. Sin indicios determinados. Una sombra lanzada sobre servidores públicos porque sí. Porque encaja en el relato.
Israel mata al cámara Ahmed Wishah y vuelve a llamar “terrorista” al periodista muerto
El cámara de Al Jazeera Ahmed Wishah fue asesinado el 20 de junio en un ataque aéreo israelí contra una vivienda del campo de refugiados de Bureij, en el centro de Gaza. No murió en una abstracción bélica. No cayó en “daños colaterales”. Fue alcanzado por un bombardeo en una casa de un campo de refugiados, uno de esos lugares donde la palabra refugio ya suena a burla cruel cuando la maquinaria militar israelí decide que no hay techo, calle, hospital, escuela, convoy, tienda de campaña ni cámara que merezca seguir en pie.
Según Al Jazeera, en el ataque murieron dos personas y al menos otra persona palestina resultó herida. La cadena fue directa: condenó el “asesinato deliberado” de Ahmed Wishah, trabajador de Al Jazeera Mubasher, y recordó que es el 12º trabajador de la red asesinado en Gaza desde que comenzó la guerra genocida de Israel en octubre de 2023. Doce trabajadores de un mismo medio muertos. Doce. Luego vendrán los portavoces con su jerga de expediente, sus frases prefabricadas y sus acusaciones sin pruebas. Pero el dato queda ahí, como una losa sobre la conciencia de un mundo que mira demasiado y actúa demasiado poco.
Vídeo | Estrenamos este domingo la segunda parte del reportaje “Palestina y la historia que quieren borrar”
Spanish Revolution estrena este domingo a las 15:00 la segunda parte de “Palestina y la historia que quieren borrar”, el reportaje dirigido y presentado por Patricia Salvador dentro de #ReportajesSR, el proyecto audiovisual dirigido por Patricia Salvador y Lea Guggelman.
Bajo el título “La Nakba eterna”, esta nueva entrega continúa el recorrido iniciado en el primer capítulo, donde se abordaba la Nakba para desmontar la mentira de que la historia de Palestina comienza el 7 de octubre.
Vídeo | El turismo que saquea las ciudades mientras sonríe para la foto
El turismo urbano ya no puede seguir vendiéndose como una postal amable, una maleta con ruedas y una pareja haciéndose fotos frente a una fachada histórica. En demasiadas ciudades se ha convertido en otra cosa. En una forma educada de saqueo. Entra sonriendo, paga tres noches, deja propina si toca, sube una historia a Instagram y se marcha. Lo que queda detrás no sale en la foto: alquileres imposibles, vecinas expulsadas, comercios de barrio sustituidos por locales sin alma y calles que ya no pertenecen a quienes las habitan.
No es turismo. Es extracción.
Seguir
Seguir
Seguir
Subscribe
Seguir