Este medio se sostiene gracias a su comunidad. APOYA EL PERIODISMO INDEPENDIENTE .
What is your sign? If you can answer that question, you are one of the 90% of adults who know your zodiac sign. This is no surprise: the media, social networks and digital applications have all recently given a new push to astrology.
In contrast, in a survey conducted in the United States, only 57% of respondents knew their blood type. What makes astrology so special?
Astrology: the study of the stars to read the future
Astrology is defined as the study of the position and movement of the stars as a means of predicting future events and finding out about people’s character. It originated in Babylon around the year 700-450 BC, when the 12 zodiac signs were established – with their interpretation focused on predicting events in the population.
It was in ancient Greece where predictions were transferred to individuals and were made based on the relative position of the stars at the time of birth. For example, the fact that a person is a Gemini means that, at the time of their birth, the Sun (projected in the sky) was in the position that aligned with the Gemini constellation.
The constellations of the zodiac are those in which the Sun is projected, in a straight line, along the Earth’s annual path.
Author provided
The Earth, when revolving around the Sun, makes its way through the different constellations. That path is known as the ecliptic plane. The sun sign, according to astrologers, represents our personality, self-perception, love compatibility, and basic preferences. Thus, studying the position of the celestial bodies can help us choose better friends, suitable love relationships, and make better decisions both professionally and financially.
As the Earth travels around the Sun (blue ellipse), the Sun appears to move through the constellations of the zodiac (black line).
Tartila/Shutterstock, Author provided
Three reasons to change your horoscope
There are at least three reasons why your zodiac sign is most likely not what you think.
The Babylonians observed that there were 13 different constellations on the ecliptic plane; however, since they had a 12-month calendar dictated by the phases of the Moon, they decided to keep that value and used 12 constellations to name the zodiacal signs. The Babylonians deliberately left one out: Ophiuchus.
All the constellations have different lengths; thus, they are in front of the Sun for variable amounts of time. For example, Leo spans 37 days while Scorpio spans only 7. This leaves many who claim to be Scorpio out of it, among other irregularities.
Due to the gravitational influence of the Sun and the Moon, the Earth wobbles slightly. Thus, the north pole deviates little by little, producing the precession effect. The result is an apparent change in the position of the constellations. Since the zodiac signs were established around 3,000 years ago, they have now moved about a month.
For someone who was born on June 1 three thousand years ago, the Sun would have been in the Gemini constellation. Currently, due to precession, on June 1 the Sun is not in Gemini but instead in the constellation Taurus.
The most famous experiment in astrology: the Naninga Astrotest
In 1996, an experiment was published in which 44 astrologers tried to match the birth data (date, time, and place) of seven anonymous people with their respective personality questionnaires.
The questionnaires were taken from the Berkeley University Personality Profile, and there were other questions also included suggested by the 44 astrologers. Aspects related to education, family, vocation, hobbies, personality, relationships, health, etc. were covered.
The astrologer who managed to correctly match the seven anonymous people’s birth data with their respective questionnaires would win $2,500. The results were disappointing for astrology: the most skilled astrologer had 3 correct matches out of 7, and half of the participants (22) did not have a single correct answer.
There are several articles that put astrology and its predictive power to the test. Spoiler alert: astrology fails every time. An astrologer has the same chances of being right about aspects of our future as anyone else who bases their responses on chance.
There are people who decide on their partner based on the zodiac signs. Nevertheless, it seems that love is not dictated by the stars. A study carried out with 10 million marriages in England and Wales showed that there is no evidence of attraction (or rejection) between the different zodiac signs.
Why astrology convinces so many
Although it is well proven that astrology does not get things right, 27% of Americans and 23% of the French believe in it, while 46% of Mexicans feel that their horoscope is something important in their lives.
Why is that? Astrology is an extremely profitable business. In the United States alone, astrology apps brought in $40 million for their creators in 2019. This makes astrology be promoted even more online, and more and more people are getting into the market.
But the most interesting thing in all this is that humans are prone to errors and biases related with judgement and reasoning. This means that horoscopes fit into our mental mechanisms. Specifically, they rely on what we know as confirmation bias and the Barnum effect.
Confirmation bias shows that prior beliefs and expectations can influence the selection, retention and evaluation of evidence; that is, we look for information that supports our ideas and ignore information that contradicts them.
For example, if our horoscope mentions that “it will be a day of strong contrasts” and we have a very calm day, we will simply ignore that prediction. However, if we really do have a day of contrasts, the first thing we will think is, “Of course, the horoscope warned me.”
The Barnum effect is a psychological phenomenon that consists of perceiving general and ambiguous descriptions (applicable to everyone) as if they were highly precise statements (made specifically for us).
The horoscope of a serial killer
In 1968, French psychologist Michel Gauquelin published a newspaper ad. In exchange for one’s name, address, date of birth and place of birth, he offered a 10-page personalised horoscope free of charge. A real bargain!
After receiving the horoscope, 94% of those who had sent in their information said they were satisfied with the results, with 90% even stating that their relatives had found the descriptions of their profile to be correct. Where is the catch? They had all received the same text! The horoscope sent out by Michel Gauquelin was that of a serial killer born in France on January 17, 1897.
Horoscopes promise certainty (“our fate is in the stars”). Therefore, it is not surprising that people usually turn to horoscopes in times of great uncertainty. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, searches related to horoscopes had their highest peak in years.
The aim of this article is not for people to stop reading horoscopes, because they can be an excellent source of entertainment and fun. Nonetheless, we must emphasise that there is no connection between the position of the stars and our lives.
And although horoscopes seem harmless fun, we must remember that French President Charles de Gaulle, Queen Elizabeth I of England and Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi all had astrologers to help them make decisions during their tenures.
Just remember that Cassius said to Brutus (in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare):
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars.
Las personas firmantes no son asalariadas, ni consultoras, ni poseen acciones, ni reciben financiación de ninguna compañía u organización que pueda obtener beneficio de este artículo, y han declarado carecer de vínculos relevantes más allá del cargo académico citado anteriormente.
Este periodismo no lo financian bancos ni partidos
Lo sostienen personas como tú. En un contexto de ruido, propaganda y desinformación, hacer periodismo crítico, independiente y sin miedo tiene un coste.
Si este artículo te ha servido, te ha informado o te ha hecho pensar, puedes ayudarnos a seguir publicando.
Cada aportación cuenta. Sin intermediarios. Sin líneas rojas impuestas. Solo periodismo sostenido por su comunidad.
Related posts
SÍGUENOS
Xbox despide a 3.200 personas: el riesgo era de los jefes, la factura es de la plantilla
Xbox acaba de confirmar la mayor reestructuración de su historia. El 6 de julio, Asha Sharma comunicó a la plantilla que la división reducirá aproximadamente 3.200 puestos durante el año fiscal 2027, con 1.600 despidos inmediatos y cuatro estudios saliendo de Xbox hacia nueva gestión. Microsoft, en paralelo, recorta unos 4.800 empleos en total, alrededor del 2% de su plantilla global. No es una anécdota. Es una purga empresarial envuelta en lenguaje de consultora.
La frase oficial es casi una confesión: “nuestro negocio hoy no es saludable”. La dirección reconoce márgenes entre 3 y 10 veces inferiores a los de negocios comparables, una base instalada menor, costes más altos y una apuesta por Game Pass, el modelo multiplataforma y una cartera más amplia de contenidos que “no creció al ritmo esperado”. Dicho sin barniz corporativo: los jefes imaginaron una máquina de crecimiento infinito, compraron estudios, multiplicaron equipos, alargaron inversiones y ahora explican que se equivocaron. Pero quienes salen por la puerta no son quienes vendieron la fantasía. Son trabajadoras y trabajadores que hicieron exactamente lo que les dijeron.
Sony quiere matar el disco: juegos digitales para ricos y propiedad de mentira
Sony ya ha puesto fecha al entierro del formato físico. En su propia web de PlayStation avisa de que, desde enero de 2028, los nuevos juegos lanzados para PlayStation se podrán comprar en PlayStation Store y en tiendas, pero solo en formato digital. Los discos de juegos publicados antes de esa fecha seguirán funcionando, sí. Ese matiz importa. Pero el camino está marcado: el futuro que Sony quiere vender no cabe en una estantería, cabe en una cuenta, en una contraseña, en un servidor y en unas condiciones de uso que casi nadie lee porque están escritas precisamente para que casi nadie las lea.
La compañía lo presenta como adaptación al consumo. Reuters informó el 1 de julio de que Sony dejará de producir discos físicos para los nuevos lanzamientos de PlayStation desde enero de 2028, en un giro que llega después de que cerca del 80% de sus ventas completas de juegos en el año fiscal 2025 fueran digitales. La cifra parece aplastante. Lo digital ya domina. Pero una cosa es que millones de personas compren digital porque es cómodo, porque hay rebajas puntuales o porque las empresas empujan el mercado hacia ahí; otra muy distinta es convertir esa tendencia en una jaula.
Organizaciones sociales señalan a Indra por engordar con el negocio de la guerra
La campaña Desarmando Indra llevó el 30 de junio a la Junta General de Accionistas una denuncia incómoda: la empresa crece mientras crecen el rearme, las fronteras militarizadas y el genocidio contra el pueblo palestino. INDRA, BENEFICIOS Y ARMAS: EL NEGOCIO QUE SIEMPRE ENCUENTRA PRESUPUESTO…
Vídeo | Dignidad contra la FIFA: el vídeo que desmonta el antirracismo de escaparate ya supera el millón de reproducciones
Nuestro vídeo sobre el gesto de Hossam Hassan contra el racismo ya supera más de 1 millón de reproducciones en apenas unas horas en nuestras redes. Y no es casualidad. La escena resume, en pocos segundos, una de las grandes hipocresías del fútbol global: la FIFA puede inventar símbolos, campañas y protocolos contra el racismo, pero cuando alguien los usa para denunciar una situación incómoda, el sistema mira hacia otro lado.
Vídeo | Votar al lobo: cuando la clase trabajadora compra el discurso de quienes la quieren más débil
Es el gran éxito político de la derecha: lograr que parte de la clase trabajadora mire hacia abajo con rabia y hacia arriba con obediencia. Que se enfade más con quien cobra una ayuda que con quien especula con su vivienda. Que sospeche más de una baja médica que de los beneficios empresariales. Que crea que pedir derechos es ser vago, pero acumular millones es mérito.
Nuestro vídeo lo resume sin anestesia: votar al lobo tiene consecuencias. No para los de arriba, que siempre tienen salida. Las consecuencias las pagan quienes dependen de un salario, de una sanidad pública, de una pensión, de un convenio, de una baja, de una vivienda digna.
Porque la política no es una camiseta de fútbol. No se vota para quedar bien con el jefe, ni para parecer más “moderado”, ni para repetir lo que dice la tertulia de la mañana. Se vota sabiendo de qué lado cae cada medida cuando llega la factura.
Si trabajas para vivir, no votes a quienes gobiernan para que otros vivan de tu trabajo.
Seguir
Seguir
Seguir
Subscribe
Seguir